一二三四区视频,亚洲少妇熟女色,日本久热无码视频网,欧美国产日韩大尺度,亚洲a视频,久久少妇一区二区,日韩999无码视频,刺激久久久久久久,啊啊啊啊不要啊在线

ChemicalBook >> journal list >> American journal of dentistry >>article
American journal of dentistry

American journal of dentistry

IF: 0.9
Download PDF

The relative anticaries effectiveness of sodium monofluorophosphate and sodium fluoride as contained in currently available dentifrice formulations.

Published:1 September 1993 DOI: PMID: 7488359
P F DePaola, P M Soparkar, C Triol, A R Volpe, L Garcia, J Duffy, B Vaughan

Abstract

A 36-month double-blind clinical caries study was conducted to determine the comparative anticaries efficacy of sodium monofluorophosphate (MFP) and sodium fluoride (NaF) as incorporated in dentifrice formulations. The test dentifrices which were utilized are commercially available in the United States and all have been granted the American Dental Association Seal of Acceptance for anticaries efficacy. The study was conducted in accordance with the 1988 Guidelines of the American Dental Association Council on Dental Therapeutics. The two formulations used in the NaF versus MFP comparison were Colgate Winterfresh Gel with 0.76% sodium monofluorophosphate in a silica base and Crest Regular Flavor Toothpaste with 0.24% sodium fluoride in a silica base. A third commercially-available NaF dentifrice, Colgate Junior Toothpaste with 0.243% sodium fluoride in a silica base, was included in the study for further comparison. Schoolchildren residing in Maine, U.S.A. received a baseline caries clinical examination and then were randomly assigned to the twice-daily use of one of the three dentifrices which were purchased in the marketplace and repackaged in plain white tubes. Caries clinical examinations were subsequently conducted after 2 and 3 years' use of the dentifrices. A total of 2,222 children participated in both the 2 and 3-year caries clinical examinations. The 36-month DFS (decayed and filled surfaces) and the DFT (decayed and filled teeth) mean caries increments for the three dentifrice groups were virtually identical. The children using the MFP formulation experienced a DFS of 1.50 and a DFT of 1.08; those using the Crest NaF formulation experienced a DFS of 1.48 and a DFT of 1.07; subjects in the third group (Colgate Junior Toothpaste, 0.243% NaF) had a DFS of 1.49 and DFT of 1.06. The statistical evaluation of the data consisted of the calculation of 90% confidence bounds for the ratio of (true) mean increments, in accordance with the 1988 American Dental Association Guidelines. Expressed in the language of the Guidelines, the analyses indicated that, (1) the anticaries efficacy provided by the MFP formulation, (Colgate Winterfresh Gel with 0.76% MFP) is "as good as" that provided by the NaF formulation, (Crest Regular Flavor Toothpaste, with 0.243% NaF), and (2) the anticaries efficacy provided by the one NaF formulation (Colgate Junior Toothpaste, with 0.243% NaF) is "as good as" that provided by the other, (Crest Regular Flavor Toothpaste, with 0.243% NaF).

Substances (5)

Related products
Procduct Name CAS Molecular Formula Supplier Price
Sodium fluoride 7681-49-4 FNa 565 suppliers $10.00-$11800.00
Sodium Monofluorophosphate 10163-15-2 FH3NaO3P 392 suppliers $10.00-$695.00
GEL-RED 21 suppliers Inquiry
Compact Junior Plate 9 suppliers Inquiry
Toothpaste 2 suppliers Inquiry

Similar articles

方山县| 岱山县| 古丈县| 松原市| 赞皇县| 姜堰市| 高平市| 姜堰市| 汉阴县| 中西区| 会昌县| 青阳县| 秀山| 澄迈县| 邹城市| 中西区| 涪陵区| 穆棱市| 大姚县| 滦平县| 嘉荫县| 乌鲁木齐县| 白沙| 广元市| 乐业县| 昭平县| 梅州市| 云梦县| 商都县| 和顺县| 富蕴县| 宁国市| 龙里县| 张家港市| 宁波市| 庆城县| 昌邑市| 榆中县| 凌海市| 湘潭市| 甘德县|